🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.